彥康你好!
感謝你來到club O 給我們這次分享, 可惜當天我有要事忙著, 來不了聽你講話, 稍後待該次講座的錄音放上網了, 一定會細聽的!
其實很多年前在學醫的過程中, 已經十分關注西醫的問題, 在許多疾病中, 西醫是沒有根治方法的, 只是壓制, 對抗的暫時解決問題. 因為表面的問題好像很快解決了, 不會醫學的 大眾, 很容易就以為病情好轉了.
在眾多問題中, 眼睛的問題是比較少人討論的, 而我一直也認為近視配戴眼鏡的方法也是按照西醫的主流思路, 就是對抗的, 治標的, 沒有解決根本問題, 我認為患者需要配戴一輩子的 眼鏡, 那是不應該的. 難道自古以來沒有近視嗎? 古代的人有近視怎麼處理? 而現代的人為什麼多了這麼多近視? 這些都是我關注的問題. 幸運地能夠看到你的書, 解決了我不少疑惑, 的 確, 現在這麼人有近視的原因, 是眼鏡(凹透鏡)造成的.
這問題其實真的很複雜, 就像西醫上的問題那樣, 如果那種治療的藥物非常有效, 那就一定賺不到錢(因為很快就治好病, 病人不用長期吃藥). 如果那種是慢性病, 例如血壓高, 糖尿, 膽固醇等的藥物, 需要服用一輩子, 那樣藥廠當然喜歡. 同理, 如果近視是可以治好的, 那許多眼鏡生產商, 還有視光師的 "飯碗" 會很大影響, 所以你所提出的真確信息, 很難會被主流所接受, 更甚會遭到非議.
正因為這樣, 我們更是十分欣賞你的勇氣, 甘願冒險逆流而說出真相, 這是相當難得的! 我想, 別人不相信不要緊, 最重要是我們明白自己所知道的. 我們相信, 紙不能包起火, 真實的事情一定會彰顯出來的, 有一天大眾會接納你所推廣的.
好的, 以後有機會的話, 一定要來拜訪你呢!
祝生活安康, 工作愉快.
後輩
宇銘
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lawson's optometrists"
To: "Vincent Lee"
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 4:57 PM
Subject: 綠色茶座
> 李大夫, (Dear Vincent)
> 12 月 2 日的綠色茶座已完滿講述個人對近視的觀點和處理手法,可惜未能與你一見,
>
> 在此感謝你、周先生和 Club-O 給予這次分享的機緣。
>
> 拜讀你的著作 " 中醫學神 "和翻聽你的中醫為甚麼?察覺你是位有理想和實幹的年輕
> 中醫師,體會你所提出的:
> 1. 不知就信----是為迷信
> 2. 不知不信----更迷信 有感而發:
>
> 上述反映大多數港人對中西醫療、對陌生 (非主流) 治療法的執信程度,以至近視了的
> 採用順其道的凸透鏡合併稜鏡的防治法,不是不相信就是充滿懷疑。
>
> 相反對近視了的便配凹透鏡卻深信不已,並單一認定遺傳決定一切,和你所說第一點不謀而合。
>
> 最無奈是絕大多數眼科醫生和視光同業也只採用簡單的凹鏡法 (表面快速解決問題), 並拒絕認
> 同凸鏡的長遠療效。
>
> 個人雖對中醫中葯不甚了解,隱約也覺得凸鏡好比眼的視覺調理 (順其看近要求),效果當然
> 遲緩並需堅持使用。
>
> 不知你對時下大眾有病即看西醫並對中醫不認識、不信任有何觀感?這使我想起你的第二點。
>
> 相信因中醫可簽發病假紙,你盡可發揚中華醫學以做福普羅大眾。
>
> 個人有感對修過理科,認識光學特性的成年父母卻否定它的應用,延誤近視防治
> 以至孩子錯失機會而終生成為近視患者深感可惜。在這裡只可以說...
>
> 知而理解卻不信------執迷不悟。
>
> 祝 愉快
>
> 梁彥康 (Steve Leung)
>
>
>
2007年7月7日 星期六
Message from Jonathan
Hi All,
I would just like to say that I believe anyone who says myopia can't
be improved using the plus lens is wrong.
I had my first eye exam when I was age 12 (Feb 2003). At the time I
was having trouble reading the board at school.
My Rx as of Feb 2003
OD: -1.25 (20/100)
OS: -0.75/-0.25 x 060 (20/70)
My eyes were worst in Jan of 2004, I estimate that they were 1/4 to
1/2 of a diopter worse than in Feb 2003. I had read about the plus
and in Apr 2004 decided to try it. I slowly but surely noticed an
improvemnt in my distance vision.
I had another eye exam in Oct 2004. My Rx as of then:
OD: -0.75 (20/30)+1
OS: -0.50 (20/25)+1
That is enough proof to me that the plus lens works at improving
myopia. I would love to hear comments on this - perhaps by an
optometrist.
Jonathan
I would just like to say that I believe anyone who says myopia can't
be improved using the plus lens is wrong.
I had my first eye exam when I was age 12 (Feb 2003). At the time I
was having trouble reading the board at school.
My Rx as of Feb 2003
OD: -1.25 (20/100)
OS: -0.75/-0.25 x 060 (20/70)
My eyes were worst in Jan of 2004, I estimate that they were 1/4 to
1/2 of a diopter worse than in Feb 2003. I had read about the plus
and in Apr 2004 decided to try it. I slowly but surely noticed an
improvemnt in my distance vision.
I had another eye exam in Oct 2004. My Rx as of then:
OD: -0.75 (20/30)+1
OS: -0.50 (20/25)+1
That is enough proof to me that the plus lens works at improving
myopia. I would love to hear comments on this - perhaps by an
optometrist.
Jonathan
訂閱:
文章 (Atom)